Non-compete agreements are designed to protect businesses by preventing former employees from competing directly with the employer after their employment ends. However, these agreements must be carefully crafted to avoid being overly restrictive, which could lead to legal challenges.

In recent years, courts have increasingly scrutinized non-compete clauses, particularly in terms of geographic scope, duration, and the specific activities restricted. Employers should consider these factors when drafting non-compete agreements:

• Reasonableness: Ensure that the restrictions imposed are reasonable in scope and duration. Courts are more likely to enforce agreements that are narrowly tailored to protect legitimate business interests.
• Jurisdictional Variations: Non-compete laws vary significantly by state. Employers must be aware of the specific legal requirements in the states where their employees work.
• Employee’s Role: The enforceability of non-compete agreements can depend on the employee’s role and access to confidential information. Agreements are more likely to be enforced against higher-level employees with access to trade secrets.
• Fairness: Arbitration agreements should be fair and balanced, offering employees a meaningful opportunity to resolve disputes. This includes allowing employees an opportunity to be involved in the arbitrator selection process providing access to necessary evidence.

Employers should also regularly review and update their non-compete agreements to reflect changes in the law and business needs.

‍